Skip to content
Chet Tailor — home
  1. Home
  2. Perspective
  3. Accessibility

Accessibility: Beyond colour contrast

Going beyond colour contrasts, aria labels and screen readers.

  • Reading time

    2 minutes

  • Audience

    Designers, content owners

  • Takeaway

    How content is delivered is part of accessibility

  • Action

    Offer open, low-friction ways to reach people

Illustration contrasting high-friction content access (apps, sign-ups, paid tools) with simple, accessible delivery via email

When we talk about online accessibility, we usually mean things like colour contrast, ARIA labels, screen readers, and keyboard navigation. More recently, we’ve also started to talk (rightly) about designing for neurodivergent users.

All of that matters.

But there's another side of accessibility that doesn't get talked about enough: how content is delivered, and the friction and barriers that come with it.

Accessibility isn't just how something looks.

It's also what you need to access it.

The other day, I received an invoice from a service provider. It arrived as a Word document. I happen to have Microsoft Word, so opening it wasn’t a problem for me.

But what about people who don’t?

Content shouldn’t force someone into using proprietary tools just to read it. Not everyone has access to the same resources, financially or otherwise, to open a file. Requiring a specific app or licence immediately creates a barrier, or at least unnecessary friction.

A PDF or even a simple HTML invoice would have avoided that entirely.

Friction is still a barrier.

Over Christmas, a service provider encouraged me to take part in an Advent calendar giveaway. Sounds harmless enough, until I realised it was hosted entirely on Instagram.

I do technically have an Instagram account, but I no longer use social media. To take part, I would’ve had to:

  • download the app
  • log in
  • find and follow the company
  • interact with them daily

Each step required effort I wasn’t willing to give.

This is the kind of friction that quietly excludes people. Not because they can't use the platform, but because they choose not to, for mental health, focus, privacy, or personal reasons.

A simple multi-channel approach could have solved this. For example, a daily email instead. That's a channel I already use and would have happily engaged with.

Accessiblity includes choice.

When planning content delivery, it’s important to think about touchpoints, not just interfaces.

Users shouldn't be forced to:

  • sign up to new services
  • download new apps
  • create accounts
  • or purchase licences

Just to access information that could have been delivered in a more open, neutral way.

Accessibility isn't only about compliance.

It's about respecting people’s time, tools, and circumstances.

If your content requires extra hoops to jump through, you're not just adding friction; you're excluding people.

Previous

Sketch illustration of a brain

Organise your mind.

A short guide to organising thoughts and ideas with mind mapping.

Next

The word Bold in yellow on a dark blue background

What’s the point of bold.

Questioning the value of visual emphasis in an inclusive web.

Contact me My YouTube
Privacy Policy

© 2026 Chet Tailor — Experience Designer

menu
  • Portfolio
  • Perspective
  • About
  • Explorations
  • Resonance App
Menu position